Thursday 12th September, back to Parisian drabness. Setting foot in our lovely capital is, how shall I put it… Some sort of challenge. The atmosphere seemed filled with rage… and raindrops. We squeezed in a few appointments and then off we went on a one-week trip. The destination is less far than the last time: Geneva. The Swiss capital would be hosting the Open Knowledge Conference, also charmingly known As the OkCon. This “little” meeting was crucial to interview the stakeholders of Open Science who slipped through the net last summer. It was also providing the opportunity to settle down and to think about what’s next…
The OKCon : meeting the stakeholders of ’”Open “
The Open Knowledge Foundation is a major organization in the world of “Open”. The OKFN started in 2000 in the UK. OK France was created last December. It is now an international network that is currently being developed. The OKFN has an important role in the facilitation of projects related to the opening of knowledge and data. It is coordinating them and is also providing technical and legal support. Last year, Helsinki had been chosen to host the Open Knowledge Festival. The Geneva Open knowledge Conference was the second meeting of this foundation.
The main topic chosen for this year was Open Data. The OKCon was divided into three distinct phases:
- One day of pre-conference, so that we can get our bearings and let Switzerland introduce her new Open Data platform.
- Two days of conference: Open Data was the main topic but other sessions about various topics of the Open were organized: particularly on Education, Culture and Technologies but also on Science and Research… Open Science was not to be outdone, with two presentations in the main lecture theatre.
- The third day saw a variety of workshops. It is worth mentioning that HackYourPhD took part to the organization of the Wikisprint of the Open Science and Citizen Science workshop. A wikisprint aims at aggregating content on wikipages within definite limits in a collaborative way.
The winds of Open Science change with CERN
The talks of the Open Science sessions were far from disappointing. Geneva was an appropriate place to discuss this matter. CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, has been carrying out a policy of openness of its research and a major effort to communicate for years. Indeed, they are on all fronts:
- Communication of scientific results to the public. John Ellis, one of CERN’s researchers, gave us a most educative presentation of the famous Higgs boson!
- Interaction between Science and Society: projects of the Cyberscience Center and Crowdcrafting platforms play a major role in the projects of citizen science.
- Collaborations and Open research practices were also largely represented. Open Acess is something that seems relatively normal for them. Researchers are starting a new phase: Open Hardware, i.e. open-source of plans, codes, etc., to create, among other things, electronic material. Javier Serrano talked about it at great length during the session dedicated to this particular topic (summary of the talks) and allowed me to interview him.
Open Science: Where are we going?
This conference was also the opportunity to see where we are today in the coordination of the Open Science initiatives. Organizations such as Mozilla Science Lab are making the first moves for coordinating the software and tools being developed for Open Science. But what else can we build?
It is difficult to come good with wider actions about Open Science. The stakeholders sometimes have a different view regarding what it represents. Anyway, I think it is necessary to understand the different views and how this movement can be characterized.
The organization of a wikisprint on the fourth day of the conference was a step in this direction. On Thursday 19th September, in the presence of the P2P Foundation and Wikipedia, twenty people in France, Switzerland and in other locations took part in this event. Here is a little souvenir from our team in Geneva.
Open Science : an area for experimentation
This meeting shows that there are some people who are willing to understand Open Science and the practices behind this concept.
After two months on the go in order to meet people who are creating this movement, I realize that there is still a lot to do. Three main areas seem to arise:
- Coordination of Open Science initiatives.
- Training and communication specifically for researchers but also for the wider public about these new research practices.
- Research about this movement and its impact (“meta-research”)
I shall develop about these three areas later on. They are perspectives that I would like to explore gradually. The trip gave way to several questions but also allowed me to set up tracks. The objective is, now we need to build the road to get there. As usual, it will be done by use of iterations and by trial and error. It is at times rather exciting to know that we can experiment and try. But it is also worrying to try to invent a future that is a bit different.
Anyway, whatever the outcome, we can expect great encounters and experimentation!
Other links about the OKCon:
Summary of the sessions about OpenData/ Science
Matthew Todd , Ernst Hafen, Karthik Ram